论文部分内容阅读
近年来 ,关于中国哲学的资质重又成为哲学界关注的话题。本组笔谈以学界对西方传统哲学的核心“是论”(本体论 )研究的进展为基点 ,指出无论从形式还是从内容上看 ,中国传统哲学都不存在“是论”的特征 ,于是就有了对中国哲学合法性的焦虑 ;并指出中国哲学的存在是事实 ,只是当人们根据西方哲学的观念和框架加以审视 ,才会对它的资质产生怀疑。论者或是分别以胡适、冯友兰与金岳霖为例 ,分析他们构建中国哲学史所依傍的正是以“是论”为核心的西方哲学 ;或是以中国哲学的存在为事实 ,提出对中西方哲学形态作新一轮比较研究的思路。中国学者能否突破两千多年西方传统哲学观的束缚 ,担当起构建中国特色哲学观的使命 ?我们期待本组笔谈将引发出新的思考与新的话题。
In recent years, the qualification of Chinese philosophy has once again become a topic of concern to the philosophical community. This essay takes the progress made by the academic circles in the study of the core “yes” (ontology) in the traditional western philosophy as a point of departure and points out that there is no “yes” characteristic in Chinese traditional philosophy in terms of form or content With the anxiety over the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy, it is pointed out that the existence of Chinese philosophy is a fact. Only when people examine it according to the concept and framework of Western philosophy, will it doubt its qualifications. Theorists take Hu Shi, Feng Youlan and Jin Yuelin as examples respectively to analyze the western philosophy which is based on “yes” as the core of their construction of the history of Chinese philosophy. Or, taking the existence of Chinese philosophy as the fact, Philosophical Shape for a New Round of Comparative Study. Whether Chinese scholars can break the shackles of more than 2,000 years of Western traditional philosophy and assume the mission of building a philosophical outlook with Chinese characteristics? We expect that this group of written speeches will lead to new thinking and new topics.