论文部分内容阅读
目的观察两种不同浅静脉留置针进针方法的应用效果。方法 287例接受输液治疗的患者应用单双号法分为研究组144例和对照组143例。研究组患者留置浅静脉留置针时应用改良后的进针方法 ,对照组患者留置浅静脉留置针时应用改良前的进针方法 ,对比两组患者的一次性穿刺成功率、穿刺并发症发生率。结果研究组患者一次性穿刺成功率为97.22%,明显高于对照组患者的89.51%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的穿刺并发症发生率为2.08%,明显低于对照组患者的6.99%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论本院改良后的浅静脉留置针进针方法 ,一次性穿刺成功率高,痛苦小,并发症少,值得其他医院借鉴应用。
Objective To observe the effect of two different methods of needle insertion into superficial vein. Methods A total of 287 patients receiving infusion therapy were divided into study group (144 cases) and control group (143 cases) by single and double number method. The study group patients with indwelling superficial vein indwelling needle application of modified needle approach, the control group patients with indwelling superficial vein indwelling needle application of modified anterior approach, compared the two groups of patients the success rate of puncture, puncture complication rate . Results The success rate of one-time puncture in study group was 97.22%, which was significantly higher than that in control group (89.51%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The incidence of puncture complication in the study group was 2.08%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (6.99%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Our hospital modified superficial vein indwelling needle approach has the advantages of high puncture success rate, little pain and few complications, which is worth learning from other hospitals.