论文部分内容阅读
目的了解句容市2011年居民死因漏报情况,寻求提高死因监测报告数据完整性的方法。方法采用定点监测与抽样调查相结合的方法,收集全市3个非医疗机构死因监测点的全年数据和四季度19个医疗机构监测点的抽样调查数据进行分析。结果 2011年句容市居民死亡漏报率为36.41%。其中殡葬部门漏报率最高,为34.30%,医疗机构调查漏报率为2.77%,公安部门漏报率为7.49%。城乡殡葬点居民死亡漏报率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),城乡医疗机构监测点漏报率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论句容市居民死亡漏报情况较为严重,应进一步采取相应措施,加强部门间合作,提高死因登记报告的质量。
Objective To understand the causes of underreporting of residents in Jurong City in 2011 and seek ways to improve the data integrity of the cause of death monitoring report. Methods The method of combining fixed-point monitoring with sampling was used to collect the annual data of three death-cause monitoring points in the city and the sample survey data of 19 medical institutions in the fourth quarter. Results The death rate of residents in Jurong in 2011 was 36.41%. Among them, the funeral and interment department had the highest false positive rate of 34.30%, the false negative rate of medical institutions survey was 2.77% and the false alarm rate of public security department was 7.49%. There was a statistically significant difference between the death rates of urban and rural residents at the funeral sites (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the reported false alarm rate between urban and rural medical institutions (P> 0.05). Conclusion The reported omission of residents in Jurong City is more serious. Corresponding measures should be taken to strengthen inter-departmental cooperation and improve the quality of the report of cause of death registration.