“文化”导向的历史文化街区保护模式探讨——以窑湾历史文化街区为例

来源 :江苏城市规划 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:peper127
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
历史文化街区的保护源自于其物质环境承载的历史文化信息,对“文化”理解的不同,导致历史文化街区保护规划模式的不同。传统保护规划将街区文化信息视为“静态”的物,规划主要任务是保住历史遗存,常导致遗存保护与现代功能拓展间的冲突。若将街区文化信息视为“动态”的活体,即“物”与“功能”的结合体,将“变”纳入文化保护的范畴,则“变”既成为保护,也成为现代性的拓展。本文在窑湾历史文化街区保护规划中,对文化保护的“动态”模式进行了尝试与探索,以期对历史文化街区的保护模式有所借鉴。 The protection of historical and cultural blocks stems from the historical and cultural information carried by their material environment. The different understanding of “culture” leads to the different protection and planning modes of historical and cultural blocks. The traditional protection plan considers the neighborhood cultural information as “static ” material. The main task of planning is to keep the historical remains and often lead to the conflict between the preservation of the remains and the expansion of modern functions. If the block culture information is regarded as the living body of “dynamic ”, that is, the combination of “thing ” and “function ”, the “change ” is included in the category of cultural protection. Become a protection, but also become the expansion of modernity. This article tries to explore the “dynamic” mode of cultural protection in the protection planning of the historical and cultural blocks in the area of ​​Yaowan, with a view to learning from the conservation model of historical and cultural blocks.
其他文献
甘林同志:您的信,还有许多同志的来信,都对1992年以来取消生物高考这一举措,提出了批评,并对由此引起的中学生物学科的削弱,生物学教师队伍的动荡以及面临新世纪到来我国生命科学的