论文部分内容阅读
现有学术期刊文后参考文献的著录大都采用GB/T 7714-2005《文后参考文献著录规则》,该规则是依据当时的文献载体的形式制定,如今8年过去了,新媒体技术使得文献载体的形式出现了新的变化。显然,2005版的《文后参考文献著录规则》中有关电子文献著录规则已经不能满足所有新媒体的文献类型。调查发现,在学术期刊的实际编辑工作中对优先出版、OA出版文献的著录格式五花八门,对网络媒体与纸媒著录方式存在模糊认识。因此,依据新媒体的文献特点,对期刊学术论文中的电子文献著录格式中存在的问题进行剖析,借鉴国外一些著录情况,提出思考建议,以期澄清一些模糊认识,推动学术期刊编辑工作的规范化和标准化。
The existing academic journals after the reference to the text are mostly used GB / T 7714-2005 “after the text reference bibliographical rules,” the rules are based on the form of the literature carriers, and now eight years later, new media technology makes the literature New changes have taken place in the form of vectors. Obviously, the 2005 edition of the “Bibliographic References Rules” of the electronic document entry rules can no longer meet all new media types of documents. The survey found that in the actual editorial work of academic journals priority publication, OA published literature, a variety of formats, there is a vague understanding of the online media and paper media Bibliographic means. Therefore, according to the characteristics of the literature of new media, this paper analyzes the existing problems in the format of electronic literatures in academic papers of periodicals, draws lessons from some foreign countries and puts forward some suggestions, in order to clarify some fuzzy understanding and promote the standardization of academic journal editing standardization.