论文部分内容阅读
间接证据在刑事诉讼证明中起到重要作用,因而刑事诉讼法专家、学者们对其进行了深入研究.但从逻辑的角度来探讨间接证据如何证明案件事实尚有欠缺,本文试图对此作点努力,以求教于前辈及同仁们.一般来说,运用间接证据证明案件事实时有两种情况,一是用单个间接证据证明案件的个别事实或某一方面的事实;二是用若干个间接证据组成证据体系证明案件的主要事实.下面,我就从这两个方面来对间接证据证明案件事实进行逻辑上的探讨.一、运用单个间接证据证明案件个别事实或某一方面事实的逻辑探讨.
Indirect evidence plays an important role in the proof of criminal procedure, so the experts and scholars of criminal procedure law have conducted in-depth research on it.But from the logical point of view, it is not clear how indirect evidence can prove the fact of the case. Efforts to seek advice from their predecessors and colleagues.Generally speaking, the use of indirect evidence to prove the facts of the case, there are two cases, one with a single indirect evidence of the facts of a case or a certain fact; the second is to use a number of indirect Evidence constitutes the evidence system to prove the main facts of the case .In the following, I will proceed from these two aspects of indirect evidence to prove the facts of the case of a logical discussion.One, the use of a single indirect evidence to prove the facts of a case or a fact .