最近电视又报道了一个居民社区的“道德银行”活动——事情两三年前就传开了。我认为这活动本身很好:鼓励为他人服务,记下服务项目及时间,承诺将来可以“支取”。但它的名称不好——既然把“服务”看成“投资”,则管这个活动称为“互助银行”或“有偿服务”,才名副其实;银行是谋利的,跟“道德”不搭界。我那时就此写了篇小文,今天再说说我的意见。 Television has recently reported on the “moral bank” activity of a residential community - something two or three years ago. I think the activity itself is very good: encourage others to serve, write down service items and time, and promise to be able to “withdraw” in the future. But its name is not good - since “service” is regarded as “investment,” this activity is called a “mutual aid bank” or “paid service.” It is a veritable fact; a bank is profit-making, not “ethical” . At that time, I wrote a small essay, talk about my opinion today.