论文部分内容阅读
《医疗事故处理条例》(以下简称《条例》)及其配套规定较好地规范了医疗机构对医疗风险的责任与义务 ,医疗事故的构成条件较以往更趋合理 ;但也存在某些缺陷和理论误区。如《条例》第 49条第 2款的规定就有悖于形式逻辑的一般原则 ,有悖于过错责任的侵权责任的一般归责原则 ,不利于强化医疗机构对医疗风险的注意义务。探讨、澄清这些问题 ,有利于医患纠纷的正确处理。审判机关在调处医患纠纷时要正确适用民法原则和《条例》规定 ,要全面审查技术鉴定资料。人民法院技术鉴定机构在医疗事件技术鉴定中要发挥积极作用。
The Regulations on Medical Malpractice (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulations”) and its supporting regulations regulate the responsibility and obligation of medical institutions to medical risks well. The conditions for constituting medical malbrasses are more reasonable than before. However, there are some shortcomings Theoretical errors. For example, Article 49, paragraph 2, of the Regulations, which violates the general principles of formal logic and the principle of general liability of tort liability that is contrary to the fault of fault, is not conducive to strengthening the obligation of medical institutions to pay attention to medical risks. To discuss and clarify these problems is conducive to the correct handling of disputes between doctors and patients. Trial organs in the mediation of medical disputes should be properly applied civil law principles and “regulations”, to a comprehensive review of technical appraisal data. The people’s court technical appraisal organ shall play an active role in the technical appraisal of medical incidents.