缺乏有效的监督手段。近几年来,我们只强调执法,却忽视执法监督这一环。制定出来的法律、法规不是无人去执行,就是走了样、变了调,甚至国法为土法所代替。按照我国法律规定,各级人大是监督法律实施的机关。但是,在现实情况下,《档案法》的实施大部分单位则靠的是自身力量,靠行政机关去发号施令,那么各级人大既不能很好地监督执法,也没有很好地去监督执法,这种缺乏有效监督的机制,不仅丧失了法律应有的严肃性,而且导致了有法不依、有法难依的普遍现象发生。可以说,在各级各类档案管理中,绝大部分是有法可依的,但是真正按照法规行事的却很少,其中主要一个原因,就是缺少一个有效的监督机制,督促各级、各部门、各单位依法办事。 Lack of effective supervision means. In recent years, we have only emphasized law enforcement, but we have ignored the loop of law enforcement supervision. Developed laws and regulations are not no one to implement, is gone, changed the tone, and even replaced by the native law. In accordance with the provisions of our law, people’s congresses at all levels are the organs that supervise the implementation of laws. However, in reality, most units implementing the “Archives Law” rely on their own strength and rely on administrative organs to issue orders. Therefore, people’s congresses at all levels can neither supervise law enforcement well nor supervise law enforcement, This lack of effective supervision mechanism has not only lost the due seriousness of the law, but also led to the occurrence of a widespread phenomenon that there is no law to rely on and no law to rely on. It can be said that most types of archives management at all levels are law-based but there are only a few who actually act according to laws and regulations. One of the major reasons is the lack of an effective monitoring mechanism to urge all levels and all Departments, all units in accordance with the law.