宋代绍兴年间(1131—1162)开凿的大足南山摩崖造像,因第5号“三清古洞”布置有较为完整的道教神御而备受学界关注。学界对实物图像和经典文本两种不同途径的仰赖程度,导致对主尊身份不同的判定结果。进而引发出的思考是:我们究竟应该更相信实物还是应该更相信经典文本?本文在前人重要的研究基础上,将实物遗存、道教经典文本与南山的仪式功能相结合,试图从方法上对这一问题做推进。 During the Song Dynasty Shaoxing years (1131-1162) dazu Nanshan Cliff statues, due to the No. 5 “Three Qing Kwu Tung ” layout has a more complete Taoist god Yu and much academic attention. The extent to which the academic community relies on both physical images and classic texts leads to different judgments on the status of Lordship. Then the elicitation is: Whether we should trust the real object or the classical text more? Based on the important research of predecessors, this article combines the physical remains, Taoist classic texts and Nanshan ritual function, This issue to promote.