论文部分内容阅读
4月26日,洛阳十二中一位教生物的老师在初一(1)班发起投票,让同学们在她和本班调皮学生豪豪(化名)之间作出选择。如果投老师的票多,老师可以不教大家的课,如果投豪豪的票多,那豪豪就自动退学。结果大部分同学投票选豪豪,豪豪因此而被迫退学。此事起因是豪豪与这位老师有矛盾,豪豪首先在班里发起投票要罢这位老师的课,老师当然生气,于是让同学们投票决定,在两人之间作出选择。采取投票这种民主的方式来解决问题本来是一种进步,然而民主不能被滥用,不是什么问题都能拿来投
On April 26, a teacher teaching biology in twelve out of Luoyang initiated a vote in the first (first) class so that the students could make a choice between her and the naughty student Hao (pseudonym) of the class. If you vote for the teacher’s votes, the teacher can not teach everyone’s class, if the votes voted Haohao Hao, then ho voluntarily dropped out of school. As a result, most of the students voted for the hero, so the hero was forced to drop out of school. The reason is that Hao Hao contradicts with the teacher, Hao Hao first vote in the class to strike the teacher’s class, the teacher of course angry, so students vote to decide between the two to make a choice. It is a kind of progress to adopt a democratic way of voting to solve the problem. However, democracy can not be abused. If it is not a problem, it can be used to vote