解构批评作为一种文学观和批评方法,历经种种非议。其中尤以上世纪70年代末米勒与艾布拉姆斯及韦恩·布斯的论争最为激烈。在这场论争中双方立场鲜明、针锋相对,并且举证扎实、论理严谨。本文以文学批评多元论和解构意义观为相互交织的两条线索,对这场学术论争进行了梳理和分析,希望能够借此辨明解构批评的理路与方法,从而对其加以客观恰当的评价。 Deconstruction and criticism as a concept of literature and criticism, after all kinds of criticism. Especially in the late 70s of last century, Miller and Abrams and Wayne Booth controversy is the most intense. In this debate, both sides stand out sharply and tit-for-tat, and give a solid proof and strict rigor. This paper, based on the two clues of intertwined pluralism and deconstructive sense of meaning in literary criticism, sorts out and analyzes the academic controversy, in the hope of discerning the rationale and method of deconstruction criticism so that it can be objectively and properly evaluated.