《李尔王》中,人物性格中的盲目导致他们走上错误的道路。尽管李尔王的视力没有大的问题,但是他在洞察力还有理解力上有所缺乏,因此被认为是盲目的。相反的,格洛斯特虽然视力看不见,却有着李尔王所缺乏的理智和远见。这种分歧导致李尔王和格洛斯特各自的身份危机。通过该剧,莎士比亚最初解构了盲目与远见的内在统一,但是在该剧的最后,又重建了二者之间的内在统一。 In “King Lear,” the blindness in the character’s personality led them to the wrong path. Although King Lear’s vision had no major problems, his lack of insight and comprehension was considered blind. On the contrary, Gloucester, though unable to see his eyesight, has the reason and foresight that King Lear lacks. This disagreement led to the identity crisis of King Lear and Gloucester respectively. Through the play, Shakespeare initially deconstructed the internal unity of blindness and foresight, but at the end of the play, reconstructed the internal unity between the two.