一九五七年前后,在苏联电影界展开了一场关于电影艺术的特性的讨论,气氛非常热烈,并提出了一系列问题。在讨论过程中你否定我,我否定你,相互否定,最后仍是没有弄清电影艺术的特性到底应当如何认识。不过收获还是有的,我们可以从这场争论中,看到不少有益于继续探索的论点。如讨论中批评了库里肖夫曾认为“蒙太奇是电影的特征”的观点。当然,持有这种观点的不仅有苏联的某些理论家,如最彻底地发展了这种观点的H·列别杰夫等,甚至还有西方的许多理论家,如R·哈姆斯就是其代表之 Around 1957, a discussion about the characteristics of cinema art took place in the Soviet cinematic community. The atmosphere was very warm and a series of questions were raised. During the discussion you deny me, I deny you, mutual denial, and finally still did not find out the characteristics of the art of the movie should be how to recognize. However, there are still gains or gains. From this debate, we can see quite a few of the arguments that are conducive to continued exploration. As the discussion criticized Currishev’s claim that “montage is a feature of the film.” Of course, not only are some theorists of the Soviet Union, such as H. Lebedev, who developed it most thoroughly, but also many theorists in the West, such as R. Harms Is its representative