论文部分内容阅读
为了应对后现代社会不确定性特征的发展,由个体失败所演绎出来的协同治理似乎成为社会治理创新的必然选择。然而,基于对不确定性的重新解读、个体失败的行为指向和对协同惰性的深刻认知,协同治理的生成逻辑存在一定的推理谬误,这并非是从“应然”到“实然”的简单跳跃。因此,有必要形成一种更适合后现代社会治理的逻辑演绎。并基于协同惰性的风险,一方面要以公共权力为逻辑起点;另一方面,要以政治认同、主体条件、经济绩效、制度保障等四个要素为功能性支撑,以期达到善治的目的。
In order to deal with the development of the uncertainty characteristics of post-modern society, the synergistic governance deduced from individual failures seems to be the inevitable choice of social governance innovation. However, based on the reinterpretation of uncertainty, the behavior of individual failure and the deep cognition of the co-inertia, there is a certain reasoning fallacy in the logic of the formation of the collaborative governance. This is not from the “should” to “real” However "simple jump. Therefore, it is necessary to form a more logical deduction of post-modern social governance. On the other hand, we should take the four elements of political identity, main body conditions, economic performance and system guarantee as functional support in order to achieve the goal of good governance.