本文考察上古汉语的“夺取”类双及物动词,得出了如下结论。(1)“夺取”类动词可分两种:“夺”是(三元)非宾格动词,“取”、“受”为(二元)非作格动词。(2)“夺”字构成的双宾结构与“给予”类双宾结构之间没有结构上的差异。(3)能否用于双宾结构由动词的语义起决定性作用,动词的个性优先于句式的语义,上古时期所谓“与格交替”并不常见。 This article examines the ancient Chinese “” “seize” type double-matter-object, reached the following conclusions. (1) There are two types of “seize” verbs: “seize” is a (ternary) non-verb, “take”, “ . (2) There is no structural difference between the double-bin structure composed by the word ”“ and the double-object structure given by ”予 予“ ”. (3) The dual-guest structure can play a decisive role in the semantics of the verbs, the individuality of the verbs takes precedence over the semantics of the sentence, and the so-called “alternating of the passing of the characters” is not common in ancient times.