论文部分内容阅读
本文以维特根斯坦的后期工作为基础,批判以实指定义作为意义解释可靠起点的意义理论。这些理论或者按照严格递归的方式以实指定义所解释的词项为起点来解释语言意义,或者按照非严格递归程序以实指定义、辅助语词以及身体动等作为起点来解释整个一种语言的意义。本文认为,实指定义易于引起误解,因而不能成为意义解释的可靠起点。并且,实指定义以理解一门语言为前提,正是对以实指定义为基础来解释意义的意义理论的颠覆。实指定义的使用预设使用者的在场,这意味着意义的解释是语用学与语义学的交融。
Based on the later work of Wittgenstein, this article criticizes the meaning theory as the starting point of significance for the meaning definition. These theories either interpret linguistic meanings in terms of strictly recursive terms starting with the terms explained by the actual meanings definition or interpret the whole one language in a non-rigorous recursive procedure starting with the definition of the actual meaning, auxiliary terms and body movements significance. This paper argues that the definition of real refers to misleading and therefore can not be a reliable starting point for the interpretation of meaning. Moreover, the definition of real refers to the understanding of a language as the premise, which is the subversion of the theory of meaning which is based on the definition of actual meaning. Refers to the definition of the use of the default user’s presence, which means that the meaning of the explanation is the integration of pragmatics and semantics.