论文部分内容阅读
按照现行诉讼法律制度,债券受托管理人不是能够代表债券持有人起诉的适格原告。但是,如果由债券持有人个人自行起诉,可能出现不同债券持有人在不同法院起诉的情况,这不仅不利于节约诉讼资源,而且还可能导致不同的法院就同一发行人违约的同一事实,做出不一致的裁判。为解决这一困境,参照比较法上的成果,由法律确认债券受托管理人代表持有人起诉是可行的,但这种原告资格的确认不应由证监会的行政规章来加以规定。
Under the current procedural legal system, the bond trustee is not a competent plaintiff who can sue on behalf of the bondholders. However, if the bondholders sue themselves on their own, different bondholders may sue in different courts, which is not only not conducive to saving litigation resources but may also lead to the same fact that different courts default on the same issuer, Make inconsistent referee. In order to solve this dilemma, it is feasible to refer to the results of the comparative law to prosecute the bond trustee on behalf of the holder. However, such confirmation of the qualification of the plaintiff should not be regulated by the administrative regulations of the CSRC.