论文部分内容阅读
目的 :比较介入化疗栓塞与化疗栓塞加电化学疗法联合治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效 ,通过分析 ,进一步探索治疗肝癌的更佳方案。方法 :本文对 64例中晚期肝癌分组法治疗 ,化疗栓塞组 (A组 ) 3 6例 ,化疗栓塞加电化学联合治疗组 (B组 ) 2 8例。通过临床资料分析 ,对比研究其治疗疗效。结果 :两者有效率分别为 64 .2 %、72 .1% ,1、2年生存率分别为 5 5 %、2 2 %和 71%、2 1%。 1年生存率有明显差异 ,2年生存率本文无明显差异。结论 :两者近期疗效以联合治疗为佳 ,远期疗效相似 ,但联合治疗适应症选择得当 ,其远期疗效亦优于化疗栓塞治疗。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of interventional chemotherapy with chemoembolization and electrochemotherapy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Through the analysis, we can further explore a better plan for the treatment of HCC. Methods: In this study, 64 cases of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were divided into group therapy, 36 cases of chemoembolization (group A) and 28 cases of chemotherapy plus embolization plus electrochemical treatment (group B). Through clinical data analysis, comparative study of its therapeutic effect. Results: The effective rates of the two methods were 64.2%, 72.1% and 1, 2 years respectively. The overall survival rates were 55%, 22% and 71%, 21% respectively. 1-year survival rates were significantly different, 2-year survival rate no significant difference in this article. Conclusions: The combination of the two curative effects is better, and the long-term curative effect is similar. However, the curative effect of the combination therapy is better than that of chemotherapy and embolization.