论文部分内容阅读
《刑法》第133条交通肇事罪规定“因逃逸致人死亡”的加重情节,以及最高法《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干为题的解释》关于“因逃逸致人死亡”的解释,最然有助于我们更好的认识“因逃逸致人死亡”问题,但是司法实践中对于“因逃逸致人死亡”的认定及具体案例中“因逃逸致人死亡”的甄别,依然存在很大的困扰。本文从立法的规定中解读“因逃逸致人死亡”的概念以及构成要件,并区分实践中与“因逃逸致人死亡”的相似情形。剖析了“因逃逸致人死亡”的实质,有效地指导了司法实践中对“因逃逸致人死亡”情形的认定。
Article 133 of the Criminal Law stipulates that the crime of traffic accident “the aggravating circumstances of” death due to escape “and the interpretation of the Supreme Law” on the specific application of law in the criminal case of traffic accident “ ”Interpretation, the most helpful to our better understanding of “ death due to escape ”issue, but the judicial practice for “ escape caused by death ”and the specific case Cause death “screening, there is still a lot of trouble. This article interprets the concept of ”death due to escape “ and the constitutional requirements from the stipulations of legislation, and distinguishes the similar situation from the ”death caused by escape “. This article analyzes the essence of ”death due to escape “, effectively guiding the cognizance of ”death due to escape " in judicial practice.