论文部分内容阅读
我国档案学学术分期的方法目前有时间分期法、范式分期法、学科制度分期法,这些分期方法为研究我国档案学的发展历程提供了各有特点的研究视角,但也有其各自的局限性。文章认为,在学术分期中每一划分标准的平衡对于全面认识一门学科的发展历程具有一定的积极意义,但在运用不同标准对档案学学术分期进行划分时,还应当正确把握其理论假设与研究结论。
At present, there are time staging method, phased staging method and disciplinary system staging method for the academic staging of archives in our country. These staging methods provide different perspectives for the study of the history of archival science in China, but also have their own limitations. The article holds that the balance of each division standard in academic staging has certain positive significance for comprehensively understanding the course of development of a subject. However, when using different standards to divide the academic staging of archives, it is necessary to correctly grasp the theoretical assumptions and Analysis conclusion.