论文部分内容阅读
纵观西方法学发展的轨迹,可以看出无论是大陆法系的理性传统还是英美法系的经验传统,都是建立在主客体思维模式的基础之上的,没有考虑建立主体间性的思维模式。主客体思维模式的缺陷在于缺少平等性的沟通,往往不是在平等的基础上思考问题,没有考虑被接受者的感受,只从自己的角度考虑做出决定;而主体间性的思维模式强调彼此平等,在平等协商中达成一致意见。本文试图从理性传统,经验主义,主客体,主体间性等四个方面来阐述法学思维模式的转变。
Looking at the trajectory of the development of Western jurisprudence, we can see that both the rational traditions of the civil law system and the experience and traditions of common law systems are based on the subject-object thinking mode without considering the establishment of an interpersonal thinking mode . The defect of the subject-object thinking mode lies in the lack of equality of communication, often not on the basis of equality thinking, without considering the feelings of the recipient, only from their own perspective to make decisions; and intersubjectivity thinking mode emphasizes each other Equality, reached agreement on equal consultation. This article attempts to elaborate the transformation of legal thinking mode from four aspects: rational tradition, empiricism, subject and object, intersubjectivity and so on.