论文部分内容阅读
【舆情回放】2016年1月7日和8日,快播涉嫌传播淫秽物品牟利案在北京市海淀区人民法院公开审理。法庭上,控辩双方进行了多轮激辩,快播公司及王欣等4名被告人坚称无罪,在网上引起激烈讨论。【网络舆情】@新华网:快播案被高度关注对案件本身的讨论,必须彻底回归法律、事实和证据,围观者的主观感受不会成为定案的依据,媒体甚至政府主管部门的态度,也不能对案件定性形成干扰。法律的终究归
Public opinion playback On January 7 and 8, 2016, the fast-broadcasting allegedly disseminated the obscene material profit-making case in the People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing for public trial. In court, the prosecutors and defense sides conducted many rounds of fights. The four defendants, fast broadcasting companies and Wang Xin, insisted that they were not guilty and aroused heated discussions on the Internet. [Network public opinion] @ Xinhua: fast broadcast case is highly concerned about the discussion of the case itself, we must return to law, facts and evidence, the subjective feelings of onlookers will not be the basis for the verdict, the media and even the attitude of government authorities, Can not disrupt the case qualitatively. The law eventually go