论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过对乐昌市人民医院口腔外科手术患者进行对照试验,探讨高频电刀与传统手术在口腔疾病治疗中的应用效果。方法:选取36例2013年5月到2016年7月期间于乐昌市人民医院就诊的口腔外科手术患者,以随机数字法进行分组,观察组18例、对照组18例。对照组采用传统手术进行治疗;观察组采用高频电刀进行手术治疗,观察和比较两组患者的手术时间、术后复诊率、术后组织肿胀程度和疼痛程度。结果:(1)与对照组对比,观察组黏液囊肿、牙龈瘤和牙龈成形术手术时间明显更短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)与对照组对比,观察组黏液囊肿、牙龈瘤、牙龈成形术术后复诊率明显更低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)观察组黏液囊肿术后组织肿胀发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组牙龈瘤、牙龈成形术术后组织肿胀发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)观察组黏液囊肿术后疼痛程度明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组牙龈瘤和牙龈成形术的术后疼痛程度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与传统手术对比,高频电刀应用于口腔外科手术中疗效显著,安全性良好。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of high-frequency electrosurgical knife and traditional surgery in the treatment of oral diseases by comparing the patients undergoing oral surgery in Lechang People’s Hospital. Methods: Totally 36 patients undergoing oral surgery at Lechang People’s Hospital from May 2013 to July 2016 were randomly divided into two groups: 18 cases in the observation group and 18 cases in the control group. The control group was treated by traditional surgery. The observation group was operated by high frequency electrosurgical knife. The operation time, postoperative recovery rate, degree of postoperative tissue swelling and pain degree were observed and compared between two groups. Results: (1) Compared with the control group, the operation time of mucinous cyst, gingival tumor and gingivaloplasty in observation group was significantly shorter, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). (2) Compared with the control group, the observation group mucosal cyst, gingival tumor, gingivaloplasty postoperative recovery rate was significantly lower, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). (3) The incidence of tissue swelling after operation in mucosal cyst in observation group was lower than that in control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tissue swelling after gingival tumor and gingivaloplasty P> 0.05). (4) The degree of postoperative pain in mucosal cyst in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional surgery, high-frequency electric knife is effective in oral surgery and has good safety.