论文部分内容阅读
随着交通运输业的发展,醉驾、无证驾驶等包含故意因素行为的不断出现,1997年刑法典对交通运输行为的规制越来越显得力不从心。为了适应不断变化、发展的新形势,2000年《最高人民法院关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》应用而生。但《解释》的出台,并没有合理地解决交通肇事罪的主观罪过问题,至此,交通肇事罪的主观罪过仍然是刑法理论界和实务界争议的焦点。
With the continuous development of the transportation industry, such as drunk driving and undocumented driving, the acts of intentional factors, such as drunk driving and undocumented driving, appear more and more inadequate in the regulation of traffic behavior in the 1997 Criminal Code. In order to adapt to the ever-changing and developing new situation, the Supreme People’s Court’s interpretation of certain issues concerning the specific application of law in the criminal case of traffic accident in 2000 came into being. However, the introduction of “explanation” does not solve the subjective sin of traffic accident crime reasonably. At this point, the subjective crime of traffic accident crime is still the focus of dispute between criminal law theory circles and practical circles.