论文部分内容阅读
“抢”带名词性宾语有时会造成歧义,这是由于“抢”的意义不同造成“抢+NP”形成不同的结构式:抢夺义“抢+NP”中,NP是受事或目标,整个结构表达一个人(或团伙)强行夺走别人的钱财物或人身,强调违背领有者意愿;抢先义“抢+NP”中,NP是表目的的旁格成分,整个结构表达一群人为了某个目的争先恐后占先机,强调多人争先;抢先义的“抢”多带VP形成状中连谓式“抢+VP”。“抢”后的宾语位置还可以出现两个名词性成分,构成“抢+NP_1+NP_2”结构,其中离“抢”近的是指人名词,离“抢”远的是指事物的名词,但是两个名词不是“抢”的双宾语,而是具有领属关系的单宾语。这是借助整体句式义观察组成成分性质、“自上而下”和“自下而上”观察句法现象的典型例子。
“Grab ” with nominal objects sometimes cause ambiguity, which is due to the different meaning of “grab” “grab + NP ” to form a different structural style: snatch righteousness Is an affair or goal, the whole structure of a person (or gang) forced to take someone else’s money or personal property, emphasizing the violation of the will of the owner; preemptive “grab + NP ”, NP is the purpose of the grid Composition, the entire structure of a group of people expressed for the purpose of playing a vanguard of competition for the first opportunity, emphasizing that many people fight first; preemptive “grab” and more with the formation of the form of “even grab” VP. “Grab ” after the object position can also appear two nominal components, constitute “grab + NP_1 + NP_2 ” structure, which away from “grab ” is near the nouns, Far refers to the noun of things, but the two terms are not “grab” double object, but with the relationship between the single object. This is a typical example of observing the phenomenon of syntactic phenomena by means of observing the components of the whole sentence, “top-down” and “bottom-up”.