程光炜的《反对文学性的年代》是一个千疮百孔的批评文本,理论上无法立足,论证上充满了逻辑的悖论,材料方面堆砌而游离。它是如此的支离破碎,只要在任何一个地方轻轻一触,它就会解体破碎。程文一个最致命的问题,是他对在文中起着最重要作用的核心概念“文学性”缺乏必要的界定。由于这个概念内涵的模糊不清,导致了整篇文章破绽百出充满矛盾,经不起推敲。因此,作者在文中得出的那些耸人听闻的结论,或者是个人的主观臆断,或 Cheng Guangwei’s “Anti-Literary Age” is a ridiculous piece of criticism that can not be theoretically justified. The argument is full of logical paradoxes, and materials are piled up and free. It is so fragmented that as long as it touches gently in any one place, it will break apart. One of the most deadly problems in Cheng’s text is his lack of the necessary definition of the core concept “literary ” which plays the most important role in the text. As the concept of the ambiguity of the concept, led to the full article full of contradictions flawed, can not withstand scrutiny. Therefore, the author’s sensational conclusions drawn from the text, either personally or subjectively, or