论文部分内容阅读
一曲《楚歌》鸣绝响柳忠秧的古体诗集《楚歌》得到谢冕、屠岸、杨匡汉、於可训、蒋述卓、黄曼君、陈世旭、樊星、刘川鄂、古远清、吕雷、杨光治等名家的高度评价。但仍有少数人对之持怀疑甚至否定态度,认为其“最大的问题是不讲格律”“是不合格的古体诗”。此说如出自一般读者,或可以一笑置之;但是,偏偏出自一些教授和不无成就的诗人,这就值得作为学术课题来严肃探讨。从表面上看,此类批评本身就有常识性问题,关键是“格律”和“古体诗”的概念混乱。从一般意义上
A piece of “Chu Song” melodrama Liu Zhong Yang’s ancient poetry collection “Chu Song” was glorified, Tuankang, Yang Kuanghan, Yu Kexun, Jiang Shuzhuo, Huang Manjun, Chen Shixu, Fan Xing, Liu Chuan E, Gu Yuanqing, Lu Lei, Yang Guangzhi Other famous highly praised. However, there are still a few people who hold the suspicion or even negative attitude, believing that “the biggest problem is that they do not talk about the law.” “The unqualified ancient poem.” This may come from the average reader or you can laugh at it. However, it is worth learning from some professors and non-successful poets. This deserves serious discussion as an academic topic. On the surface, such criticisms have their own problems of common sense. The crux of the matter is the confusion between the notions of “law” and “ancient poem.” In a general sense