论文部分内容阅读
部分医学期刊论著来稿中,讨论部分常出现各种问题。从理论上讲,医学论著的“讨论”部分应包括的内容是基本明确的,与国内外现实医学论著讨论部分的层次标题是相适应的,但不同人的理解既有“大同”也存在“小异”。本文根据医学论著讨论部分理论上应包含的内容和现实医学论著讨论的层次,结合读者需要,认为医学论著讨论部分实行完全的结构化不太现实,但可以实行准结构化。准结构化模式为:推荐性结构+开放性问题,最好配以层次标题。推荐性结构包括主要发现、可能机制、论证强度、综合证据、意义与应用、结论等共6个方面,其中,第2、3、4方面为论证方面的结构,部分文献可能缺省某方面结构。
Some medical journals in the contributions, the discussion part often appear various problems. In theory, the content of the “discussion” part of medical treatise should be basically clear, which is in line with the level title of the discussion part of the actual medical treatises both at home and abroad, but different people have both “ There are also ”little difference ". Based on the discussion of medical theories about the content that should be included in the theoretical treatise and the level of discussion in the field of medical treatise, this paper is not realistic enough to discuss completely the structure of discussion in the medical treatise according to the needs of the readers. However, quasi-structuring can be implemented. Quasi-structured mode: recommended structure + open question, preferably with the level title. The recommended structure includes 6 main aspects such as main findings, possible mechanisms, intensity of argument, comprehensive evidence, meaning and application, conclusion and so on. Among them, the second, third and fourth aspects are the structures of the argument, and some of the documents may default to some aspect of the structure .