很多年前,我曾先后见过两位作家写的文章。前一位说,给小说或剧本中的人物取名,看似容易,其实颇费心思。名字起得好,有利于人物塑造,也有利于形象在人群中传播。他还提出一个检验电影角色取名成功与否的标准:当观众看完一部电影而议论其情节时,说不出角色的名字,而只能用饰演该角色的演员之名来替代,那就说明角色取名不成功;反之,则为成功之例。这些话,我现在想起来觉得很有道理。因为每次我和老伴谈论看过的电视剧,总是叫不出角色的名字,只能用演员之名来代替;倘若连演员也叫不出名字,那就只能不谈了。另一位作家说他写小说,给人物起名往往缺乏生活气 Many years ago, I had seen articles written by two writers. The former one said that it might seem easy to name a character in a novel or play, but in fact it is quite a bothering mind. The name plays well, is conducive to characterization, but also conducive to the image of the spread in the crowd. He also put forward a standard to test the success of the movie’s role name: when the audience after watching a movie talking about their plot, can not say the name of the character, but only with the name of the actor playing the role to be replaced, that It means that the role named unsuccessful; the other hand, the case of success. These words, I now think it makes sense. Because every time I talk to my wife and watch the TV series, always can not tell the name of the character, can only be replaced by the name of the actor; if the actor can not name, it can only talk about it. Another writer said that he wrote novels, often giving people a lack of vitality