论文部分内容阅读
王弼对言说问题的论述在其各类著述中一以贯之,在《老子注》和《老子指略》中,他对“言为何不尽意”的问题作了正面响应,这一响应又同“名号”与“称谓”的界定相关联。对“名号”与“称谓”的划分和使用,恰是为了理解和认识本体之“无”的需要所作之思考。王弼认为名号与称谓的区别在于使用之不同,亦即他们发挥的言说效用不同。因此,只有首先清楚如何看待语言的运用,才不至于陷入言说的圈套而不能自拔。
Wang Bi’s discourse on the issues of speech consistently responds in all his writings to the issue of “why not” in “Lao Tzu Note” and “Lao Tzu”, and the response is the same “Name ” is associated with the definition of “title ”. The division and use of the “name” and “title” precisely in order to understand and understand the noumenon’s “nothing ” needs. Wang Bi believes that the difference between titles and appellations lies in their different uses, that is, they have different utterances. Therefore, only by first knowing how to use language can we not get caught up in the trap of speech.