论文部分内容阅读
“大同小康”之论是否出于孔子之口 ,古往今来经历了一个始信终疑的曲折过程。最早提出质疑的是包括朱熹在内的宋代学者 ,元代的陈更是斩钉截铁地指出 :“大同小康之说 ,则非夫子之言也。”2 0世纪三四十年代 ,围绕孔子与“大同小康”之论的关系问题 ,学界爆发了一场非常激烈的学术论战 ,但是最终未能形成一致的意见。“大同小康”之论不是出于孔子之口 ,因为孔子仕鲁期间 ,他不可能向童稚之年的子游讲论“大同小康”之义 ;周游列国返鲁之后 ,他不可能“与于蜡宾” ,从而也不可能在蜡祭事毕讲论“大同小康”之义 ;特别需要指出的是 ,“大同小康”之论明显带有杂糅众家思想的特征 ,存在着历史知识的错误 ,表露的是一种历史倒退论的观点 ,它不可能出自孔子之口。
Whether or not the theory of “doing the right thing without compromising one’s well-being and well-being” out of the mouth of Confucius has gone through an ups and downs of tortuous conviction throughout the ages. The earliest questioned is the Song Dynasty scholars, including Zhu Xi, the Yuan Dynasty Chen Kui is categorically stated: “Datong well-off, it is non-Confucius.” In the 1930s and 1940s, around Confucius and “ Common sense and well-being ”theory, the academic community broke out a very fierce academic debate, but in the end failed to form a consensus opinion. It is not out of Confucius’s view that “commonwealth of the people should be well-off” should not be spoken of because during his stay in Shi Lu, Confucius can not talk about the meaning of “common prosperity” when he visits the country. He can not “ It is also impossible to talk about the meaning of ”commonweal of well-being and well-being“ at the stage of wax sacrifice. In particular, it needs to be pointed out that the theory of ”getting well-to-do" contains the characteristics of misunderstanding among the various public figures, and there is a mistake in historical knowledge Is a view of historical regression, it can not come from the mouth of Confucius.