论文部分内容阅读
全国“中华好风尚”主题公益广告获奖作品公布后不久,南方某一大报的周刊马上刊出署名文章称该项评选中平面广告金奖作品“飞”竟是“剽窃”台湾某设计者的关于鸟的书籍封面设计作品,一时国内广告界舆论大哗。获奖某报对其报业同行的做法大为不满,于是一份状纸告到国家工商局,据理要求主持公道,并声称保留法律诉讼维护其合法权益的权利。国家工商局有关部门即时把有关材料传真给各位评委听取他们意见,而各位评委也由于
Shortly after the publication of the award-winning works of the nation’s “China Fashionable” theme public service advertisements, the weekly magazine of a major newspaper in the south immediately published a by-line article stating that the “Flying” project of the plane advertisement gold medal was “plagiarism”. A book design work by a certain designer in Taiwan on a bird’s book covers public opinion in the domestic advertising industry. The award-winning newspaper was greatly dissatisfied with its newspaper industry peers, so a paper was reported to the State Administration of Industry and Commerce, and it was reasonable to preside over justice and claimed to retain the right to legal proceedings to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests. The relevant department of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce immediately faxed relevant materials to the judges to listen to their opinions, and the judges also