论文部分内容阅读
学术评价是学术发展与学科建设中的重要一环,学术评价推动了人文社会科学的繁荣发展;专业评价机构对人文社会科学评价产生了重要影响。但目前的学术评价中存在着过于强调量化考核和文献计量,以发表载体判断成果质量等不足。应当强调创新和质量导向,完善公正开放的同行评议制度,注重国际间的合作共赢发展。复印报刊资料的论文精选坚持同行评议的主体地位,采用定性与定量相结合的评价理念和指标体系,基于论文精选形成期刊评价、机构评价、作者评价、论文评价、学科评价的完整体系,学术影响力逐年提高。未来将继续积极推进“创新和质量导向的人文社科学术评价体系”建设。
Academic evaluation is an important part of academic development and discipline construction. Academic evaluation promotes the prosperity and development of humanities and social sciences. Professional evaluation institutions have an important impact on the evaluation of humanities and social sciences. However, there are some problems in the current academic evaluation, such as too much emphasis on quantitative assessment and bibliometrics, in order to express the quality of the results. We should emphasize innovation and quality orientation, improve the fair and open peer review system, and pay attention to the win-win development of international cooperation. Selected papers of copying newspapers and periodicals adhere to the dominant position of peer review, the use of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the concept and index system, based on the selection of papers to form the periodical evaluation, institutional evaluation, author evaluation, thesis evaluation, subject evaluation of a complete system, Academic influence increased year by year. In the future, we will continue to actively promote the construction of an academic and academic evaluation system of humanities and social sciences based on innovation and quality.