论文部分内容阅读
那天,我组织小班幼儿学习用纸折鱼,材料是大小不一的各色蜡光纸。以前我曾把材料放在桌子中间让幼儿自由选择,结果小班幼儿从众心理强,一个选大的,大家都选大的;一个选红的,大家都选红的,导致场面混乱。所以今天我想把材料随机分发给幼儿,在分发材料前我告诉幼儿:“纸有大有小,颜色也不一样,请你们用老师分的纸折一条漂亮的鱼儿。等一会儿,我们把不同大小、颜色的鱼儿贴到墙上蓝色的‘大海’里去!”活动安静地进行着。当我来到政政身旁时,我发现政政一脸不高兴。“政政,怎么了?”政政说:“我不要这张小纸,我要换大纸。”“为什么?”“因为我想折大鱼。”我轻声地劝他:“你先折一条小鱼儿,然后再用大纸好吗?”政政却态度坚决地说:“不,我现在就要换。”我决定先“冷处理”一下,希望他看见同伴们折出各种鱼时会改变想法,可直到活动结束时政政仍不愿意折小鱼。事后,我把这事跟同事说了,他们大多认为应该给政政换纸。有的说:“活动的重点是折纸,支持孩子的活动就该同意他换纸。”有的说:“为什么不把纸放在桌子中间让孩子自己选呢?”同事们的话引起了我的思考,但我也谈了我的观点:“既然事先有过要求,幼儿就应遵守。如果幼儿连小小的挫折都无法承受,将来怎么面对社会?”话虽这么说,但说句心里话,直到现在我仍不知道该不该为政政换纸。您怎么看待这一案例?如果是您,您会如何处理?
That day, I organized a small class of children studying paper folding fish, the material is different sizes of colored wax paper. In the past, I had placed materials on the table so that children could choose freely. As a result, young children in small classes were strongly mentally handicapped. All of them selected large ones. One of them who had chosen red and all of them selected red led to chaos in the scene. So today I would like to distribute the materials to young children at random, and I told the children before distributing the materials: “The paper is small and the color is different, please fold the beautiful fish with the paper of the teacher. Put fish of different sizes and colors on the blue sea in the wall! ”The activities were quietly carried out. When I came to the side of politics, I found the government look unhappy. “Politics, what happened? ” The government said: “I do not want this piece of paper, I want to change the big paper. ” “Why? ” “Because I want to break the big fish. ” I softly To persuade him: “You first fold a small fish, and then re-use the big paper?” “Political attitude but firmly said: ” No, I will now change. “I decided to ”Hopefully, he would see his colleagues change their minds when they turned out various kinds of fish, until the event is over and the government is still reluctant to cut fish. Afterwards, I told my colleague about this matter, most of them think that the paper should be changed for the government. Some said: “The focus of the activity is origami, in support of the child's activity, he should agree to change the paper. ” Some said: “Why not put the paper in the middle of the table to let the child choose? ” I was thinking about it, but I also talked about my point of view: “Since children have their own requirements beforehand, young children should abide by them. If young children can not afford even minor setbacks, how can they deal with society in the future?” Said, but to be honest, until now I still do not know whether to change the paper for politics. What do you think about this case? If it is you, what will you do?