一位医生为病人做完手术后,并没有为其输血,医生于是向病人家属解释了其中的缘由:在手术失血较少的情况下输血往往弊大于利。目前血源状况的优劣是一个方面,由于输血而影响了失血后的造血功能,更不利于自身的恢复与健康。 医学的常识与足球上的事往往隔行不隔理。“输血”虽能救急,管用当时,但长远地看,恐怕会带有一定的副作用,以致影响自身机制的优化与健全;“造血”虽然有一定的过程,但能使自身的肌体得到锤炼,更能益寿延年。如果自身的肌体低下,确实需要“输 A doctor did not transfuse blood for the patient after surgery, and the doctor explained to the patient’s family one of the reasons: blood transfusions often do more harm than good with less blood loss. The current status of blood is one aspect of the pros and cons, due to blood transfusion and the impact of hematopoietic function after blood loss, but not conducive to their own recovery and health. Common sense of medicine and football are often interlaced. Although “blood transfusion” can be both urgent and effective at the time, in the long run, it may bring certain side effects that will affect the optimization and soundness of its own mechanism. Although “hematopoiesis” has a certain process, it can make its own body be tempered, Better longevity. If your body is low, you really need to "lose