论文部分内容阅读
本文分析对象在于司法精神病鉴定与强制医疗程序间的关系问题,在于看似分布于刑事诉讼法不同章节和范畴的制度间的联系问题,正是司法精神病鉴定对强制医疗程序的整体构造发生着决定性的影响。法官在面对普通证据的审查判断上,由于缺乏心证能力,导致在实践中出现“相对证据证明力法定化”现象,而在鉴定意见这样的科学证据面前,则进一步陷入“绝对证据证明力法定化”境地,而当问题最终进入强制医疗程序中的精神病鉴定这个特殊领域,则因为司法精神病鉴定又不同于一般科学鉴定,从而导致出现更为严重的问题。也就是说,本文讨论的焦点其实并非广义上的鉴定问题,而是特指其中的司法精神病鉴定,但是,要想对该问题进行深入分析,就必须首先对普通证据的审查判断进行第一个层面的分析,继而在此基础之上,对科学证据的审查甄别进行第二层次的分析,最终,才能透过这两层分析,清晰看到作为科学证据中的特殊种类—司法精神病鉴定的法官判断问题,而法官对这一特殊种类证据的判断,正是决定强制医疗程序本身性质归属的关键所在。同时,这也是司法精神病鉴定与强制医疗程序二者结合的联接点所在,是将传统刑诉研究中并未关联的两种制度进行系统化分析的基础。
This article analyzes the relationship between judicial psychiatry and compulsory medical procedures. The problem lies in the connection between the systems that appear to be distributed in different chapters and categories of criminal procedure law. It is the determination of judicial psychiatry that determines the overall structure of compulsory medical procedures Impact. In the face of common judge’s judgments and judgments, the judge’s “lack of ability to testify” led to the emergence of “statutory proof of relative proof of evidence” in practice. However, in the face of scientific evidence such as opinion, Evidence of the power of legalization "territory, and when the problem eventually entered the mandatory medical procedures for the identification of psychiatric in this special area, because the judicial psychiatric identification is different from the general scientific appraisal, resulting in more serious problems. In other words, the focus of this article is actually not a generalized identification problem, but rather one of the identification of judicial psychiatry, but in order to conduct an in-depth analysis of the issue, we must first of ordinary evidence review to judge the first Level analysis, and then on this basis, the screening of scientific evidence screening for the second level of analysis, and finally, through these two levels of analysis, can clearly see as a special kind of scientific evidence - Judicial psychiatry judge Judging the problem, the judge’s judgment of this particular kind of evidence is the key to determining the nature of the mandatory medical procedure itself. At the same time, this is also the connection point between the judicial psychiatric appraisal and the compulsory medical procedure, which is the basis for the systematic analysis of the two systems that are not related in the traditional criminal lawsuit research.