论文部分内容阅读
在李斯特的经济学理论体系中,民族国家将长期存在且存在利益差别是分析前提,生产力理论是其核心,包括关税保护等政策主张是手段,而在生产力理论中,精神资本是决定性的。东亚等发展型国家的经济赶超实践并丰富了李斯特的理论,同时也暴露出李斯特经济学对国家概念理解的不足,尤其是对国内政治结构的忽视。当代李斯特主义者沿袭了李斯特的国家主导经济和致力于战略性产业的传统,并对传统李斯特主义长期忽视的社会发展问题给予了关注,但是,在全球化时代,当新自由主义对民族国家的干预能力构成一种“自动的”或“宪政化的”约束的前提下,如何提供更具可行性的发展战略和产业政策,是当代李斯特主义者面临的挑战。
In Liszt’s system of economic theory, the long-standing existence of differences in interests between the nation-state and the existence of interests is the premise of analysis. The theory of productive forces is the core of the system, including policy advocacy such as tariff protection. In the productivity theory, spiritual capital is decisive. Economic growth in developing countries such as East Asia overtook practice and enriched Liszt’s theory. At the same time, it also exposed the inadequacy of Liszt economics in understanding the concept of the state, especially the neglect of the domestic political structure. Contemporary Listerians follow Liszt’s tradition of state-dominated economy and devoted to strategic industries, and pay attention to the long-neglected social development issues of traditional Listentles. However, in the age of globalization, when neoliberalism How to provide more feasible development strategies and industrial policies on the premise of the “autonomous” or “constitutionalized” restraint of the intervention power of the nation-state constitutes a challenge faced by the contemporary Listerians.