论文部分内容阅读
指称问题在语言哲学和科学哲学中处于基础性和根本性地位,穆勒、弗雷格、罗素等人均对指称问题提出过自己的观点。什么是专名自身的涵义,专名自身有无涵义?专名与摹状词有何区别都是指称问题中需要探讨的问题。罗素对弗雷格将专名与摹状词混为一谈的观点提出了批评意见,并表达了自己的观点。罗素的批评一方面指出了专名与摹状词的本质区别,但另一方面在专名有无指称方面前后观点自相矛盾。解决这一系列问题的关键在于语境和人的认识。
Alleged problems in the language philosophy and philosophy of science in a fundamental and fundamental position, Mill, Frege, Russell and others on the issue of allegations put forward their own views. What is the meaning of the proper name and the meaning of the proper name? What is the difference between the proper name and the description word? Russell made a critical comment on Frege’s idea of confusing the proper names and descriptions, and expressed his point of view. On the one hand, Russell’s criticism pointed out the essential distinction between proper names and descriptions, but on the other hand, there are contradictions in front of and behind the name of the proper names. The key to solving this series of problems lies in the context and people’s understanding.