论文部分内容阅读
当前我国刑法学中的实质解释论与形式解释论的争议是涉及到怎么用价值论判断问题。从这次争论中可以发现,实质与形式在指涉和运用上比较混乱,并有可能发生误读、混淆甚至曲解对方观点的现象,两者所表示的解释理论与起事实情况也不一样;再次,实质解释论在论证逻辑上也有值得商讨的地方也就是实质的真实性。两大方面存在许多主要的分歧,起于对刑事法治基本任务的不同定位。我国刑法学中的形式解释论与实质解释论争议,在本质上有不同于相关于欧洲争论的地方。
At present, the controversy between substantive interpretation theory and formal interpretation theory in China’s criminal jurisprudence is related to how to use value theory to judge the issue. From this debate, we can find that the essence and form are more chaotic in terms of reference and use, and there is a possibility that misunderstandings, confusion or even misinterpretation of the views of the other side may occur. Both the theories of interpretation and the facts are not the same. Thirdly, the substantive interpretation theory is worth discussing in the logic of argument as well. There are many major differences between the two major aspects, starting from the different orientations of the basic tasks of criminal law. In our country, the controversy of formal interpretation and substantive interpretation in criminal jurisprudence is essentially different from that of the controversy in Europe.