论文部分内容阅读
目前,对海德格尔的研究,特别是对海德格尔技术思想的研究正在逐渐退出技术哲学界考察的视野,海德格尔思想的研究似乎已经有了定论,即从理论上讲是神秘主义的,从实践上讲是寂静主义的。但事实是否确实如此,针对此问题,美国海德格尔思想研究专家、技术哲学家伊恩·汤普森分别从理论方面就海德格尔技术思想与传统形而上学之间的关系,从实践方面就海德格尔技术思想与后马克思主义特别是芬伯格技术批判理论之间的关系进行了回答。在第一个访谈中,汤普森以本体神学这个概念为核心对海德格尔的技术批判作了更本质的解读,把技术问题转化成了存在之技术的领会问题,从而把技术与现代性联系了起来,并且提出了一种新的存在之后现代的领会。
At present, the study of Heidegger, especially the study of Heidegger’s technical thought is gradually withdrawing from the field of philosophy of technology philosophy. The study of Heidegger’s thought seems to have been concluded that it is theoretically mystic , In fact, is static. But whether this is the case or not? In response to this question, Ian Thompson, the expert on the study of Heidegger in the United States and the philosopher of technology, respectively, from the theoretical perspective, on the relationship between Heidegger’s technical thinking and traditional metaphysics, Technical thinking and post-Marxism, especially the relationship between the theory of technical criticism of Feenberg was answered. In the first interview, Thompson made a more substantive interpretation of Heidegger’s technical critique with the concept of ontology as the core, transformed the technical problem into the understanding of the existing technology, and thus linked the technology with the modernity Rise up and present a new understanding of modernity after its existence.