论文部分内容阅读
作为纪传体通史的鼻祖,《史记》在中国古代史学史和文学史上产生了很大影响。汉代以来,历代都有不少学者对《史记》进行研究,可以说我们今天的《史记》研究就是在前代研究成果基础上的进一步拓展和深入。但长期以来,学者们大多关注于对《史记》本身的研究,而对《史记》研究的历史发展过程及不同时期的特点却缺乏足够的重视。本论文试图对《史记》研究的历史作一勾勒,对每一时期的重要成果进行介绍,在比较各阶段《史记》研究不同特点的基础上,把握《史记》学史发展的脉络。由于时间有限,所以本论文只论及自汉至唐的《史记》研究状况,宋至清的《史记》研究史留待日后完成。
As the originator of the history of discipline and mass communication, “Historical Records” in ancient Chinese history and literary history had a great impact. Since the Han Dynasty, many scholars in all ages have studied the Records of the Historian. It can be said that our study of the Records of the Historian today is based on the research results of the previous generation and further developed. For a long time, however, scholars mostly focused on the study of the Records of the Historian, but lacks sufficient attention to the historical development of the Records of the Historian and the characteristics of different periods. This thesis attempts to outline the history of the study of the Book of Records and introduce the important achievements of each period. Based on the comparison of the different characteristics of the study of the Book of Records, we grasp the development of the history of the Book of Records. Due to the limited time, this thesis deals only with the research status of “Historical Records” from Han to Tang Dynasty, and the research history of “Historical Records” by Song Zhiqing remains to be completed in the future.