论文部分内容阅读
本文主要是从四个方面对卡西尔关于文化哲学中的符号世界与波普尔的三个世界思想进行比较:1)从波普尔“世界三”的界定与卡西尔对符号世界的分类,指出他们所确定的这两个世界有相似也有相异之处;2)从“世界三”的本体与卡西尔符号世界的社会人之本入手,指出“世界三”的依据是柏拉图主义;3)从他们二人对思想实验的历史情景设计差异入手,波普尔提出的图书馆实验,暴露了他还残留着笛卡儿二元论的残迹。而卡西尔则设计了一个荒岛经历,指出,人是通过时间——历史来进行记忆,并凭借意义对符号进行整理;4)他们两人对笛卡儿二元论分析的差异,指出波普尔最后陷入了笛卡儿二元论的陷阱,而卡西尔则指出笛卡儿二元论是由于以研究对象而不是以研究方法作为划分科学的界限而造成的;5)最后得出的结论就是:科学活动仅仅是人类文化活动的一个组成部分。
This article mainly compares Cassirer’s three world ideas about Popper’s philosophy world and Popper’s four worlds from four aspects: 1) From Popper’s definition of “Three Sides of the World” to that of Cassirer’s It points out that there are similarities and differences between the two worlds that they have identified. 2) Beginning with the ontology of "world ’s and Cassirell Based on Platonism; 3) Starting from their differences in the design of the historical scenarios of ideological experiments, Popper’s library experiments expose his remnants of Descartes’s dualism. And Cassirer designed a desert island experience, pointing out that people make memories through time and history and sort symbols by meaning; 4) The differences between them on Cartesian dualism indicate that Popper And finally fell into the trap of Cartesian dualism, while Cassirer pointed out that Descartes’s dualism was caused by the research object rather than the research method as the dividing line between sciences; 5) the final conclusion was that scientific activities It is only one part of human cultural activities.