论文部分内容阅读
不久前,北京某家名气很大的艺术品拍卖机构以天价拍出徐悲鸿的一件油画作品。该作品的确出自徐悲鸿的手笔,可是,由于保存不当,该作品受损严重,画面上只留下了斑驳的笔痕。而被拿到拍卖会之前,那件油画被加工过,由于原作上很难看出形象,所以加工的过程几乎等同于重画。若是加工者真的有能力再现原作的风貌,这样做倒也无可厚非,但从最后的效果来看,作者的水平远远达不到这一水准。因此,从艺术欣赏角度而言,该拍卖品根本体现不出徐非鸿的风格,从学术研究的角度来看,该作品更没有多
Not long ago, a well-known Beijing art auction house auctioned a piece of Xu Beihong’s paintings at a high price. The work is indeed written by Xu Beihong. However, due to improper preservation, the work was seriously damaged, leaving only mottled pen marks on the screen. Before it was taken to the auction, the piece of oil was processed. Since the original image was hard to see, the processing was almost the same as redrawing. If the processors really have the ability to reproduce the original style, this is understandable, but the final effect, the author’s level is far below this level. Therefore, from an artistic appreciation point of view, this auction item does not reflect the style of Xu Honghong at all. From an academic research point of view, there is not much