论文部分内容阅读
目的比较安舒环和爱母环两种宫内节育器的临床避孕效果。方法对该站2012年1月—2014年1月收治400例自愿要求避孕的育龄妇女,按照自愿的原则,分为观察组和对照组,随访12个月,观察使用效果及不良反应。结果观察组200例,因症取出1例,占0.5%,脱落1例,占0.5%,续用195例,占97%;对照组200例,因症取出10例,占5%,脱落20例,占5.5%,续用170例,占85%,观察组因症取出率、脱落率低于对照组,续用率高于对照组,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组带器妊娠1例,占0.5%,对照组5例,2.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月、6个月不良反应发生率分别为4.00%、3.50%、2.0%低于对照组16.00%、16.00%、7.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论安舒环避孕效果更好,不良反应发生率更低,且有助于降低远期妇科疾病发病风险。
Objective To compare the clinical contraceptive effect of Anshun and Aim ring with two IUDs. Methods From January 2012 to January 2014, 400 women of childbearing age who contracted voluntary contraception were divided into observation group and control group according to the principle of voluntariness. The patients were followed up for 12 months to observe the effects and adverse reactions. Results The observation group of 200 cases, due to illness removed in 1 case, accounting for 0.5%, 1 off, accounting for 0.5%, 195 cases continued to use, accounting for 97%; control group 200 cases, 10 cases due to disease, accounting for 5%, off 20 Cases, accounting for 5.5%, continued to use 170 cases, accounting for 85%, the removal rate of the observation group was lower than the control group, the continuation rate was higher than the control group, the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05); One case of pregnancy with group placenta was observed, accounting for 0.5%, while the control group was 2.5% and 2.5% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). The observation group had 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation The rates of response were 4.00%, 3.50% and 2.0%, respectively, which were lower than 16.00%, 16.00% and 7.00% of the control group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Anshu ring contraceptive effect is better, the incidence of adverse reactions lower, and help to reduce the risk of future gynecological diseases.