论文部分内容阅读
刑法实践中的归责问题首先是一个行为及其结果是否与法律的要求相冲突的违法性问题,而违法乃是一个法益侵害与规范违反相统一的结构,当行为客观上造成了法益侵害的结果时,行为人是否应当对该结果负责,首先决定于行为是否违反规范,而规范违反并不是抽象的,按其实质内容而言,亦即行为人的行为对行为对象制造了不被允许的风险。故客观归责理论乃是违法论中的归责理论或归责理论化了的违法论。由于构成要件并非构成特定结果之原因的构成要件,而是构成特定之违法、有责行为的构成要件,故客观归责理论并非判断因果性的理论,而是一种判断犯罪构成符合性的理论。
Imputation in the practice of criminal law is the first issue of an act and the result of whether or not the conflict with the law requirements of the illegality, but the law is a law violations and normative violations of the unity of the structure, when the act objectively infringed the interests of law As a result, whether the perpetrator should be held accountable for the result depends primarily on whether the act is in violation of the norms and that the normative violation is not abstract. In its essence, the perpetrator’s actions have not allowed the perpetrator risk. Therefore, the theory of objective imputation is attributed to theory of imputation in the theory of illegitimacy or theory of illegitimacy imputed to theory. Since the constituent elements are not the constituent elements that constitute the cause of a particular result but constitute the constituent elements of a specific offense and responsibility, the theory of objective imputation is not a theory for judging causality but a theory for judging the conformity of criminal composition .