拙文《毕昇墓碑鉴定及相关问题考证》在《中国文物报》披露后,引起各界关注。特别是我国印刷史学泰斗张秀民老先生,以其86岁高龄,于盛夏大暑节挥汗著文赐教。他以《英山发现的是活字发明家毕畀的墓碑吗?》一文提出质疑,读后我深受启迪。张老质疑之要点有三: 一、英山毕昇墓碑是宋碑还是元碑?其年款是否为元之“皇庆”。二、对布衣毕昇死于皇祜三年表示怀疑。三、认为英山毕界可能是与布衣毕昇同名同姓者。为有利研究探讨,谨作简答,敬希张老及读者教正。一、关于墓碑的时代特征与具体年代。在草撰拙文时因惧劣作必冗之讥,未将墓碑年代考证依据一一阐发。今既质疑,不妨稍加铺叙,以解疑难。 1.此碑确为宋代特征。其依据有三:第 Zhuo Wen “Bi Sheng tombstone identification and related issues research” in the “China Cultural Relics Daily” after the disclosure, aroused public concern. In particular, Mr. Zhang Xiumin, a famous author of the history of printing in our country, has given his 86-year-old an early age to sweat the poem of the poem. He questioned the question “Is it a British tombstone found by a biographer?” I read it very much. Zhang doubts the main points there are three: First, the British Hill Bi Sheng tombstone monument or monument is the yuan? The year whether the yuan for the “Emperor Qing.” Second, he was suspicious of his death from imperial clan three years. Third, that the British Hill may be the same name with the same name as commoner commoner who. For the benefit of research, I would like to make a brief answer, King Chi Zhang Lao and readers to teach. First, on the tombstone characteristics of the times and the specific era. In clerical essay due to fear of poor for ridiculed ridiculed, did not elaborate on the basis of the tombstone age one by one. At this moment, we can not doubt whether it is necessary or not. 1. This monument is indeed the characteristics of the Song Dynasty. Its basis is three: the first