论文部分内容阅读
文章调查研究英国、荷兰、美国、日本的典型人文社会科学研究评价活动,发现这些国家人文社会科学研究评价具有高度制度化、国际化的特点,研究成果的原创性、研究的社会影响、研究的可持续发展性成为评价标准的主要内容,评价过程规范且由专家主导,计量指标只供专家参考,基于高水平代表作的外部评价是一种基本评价形式。这些经验对于建立我国人文社会科学研究评价体系,引导人文社会科学研究面向社会实践、面向国际水准、面向可持续发展,具有重要借鉴意义。
The article investigates and evaluates the typical humanities and social sciences in the United Kingdom, Holland, the United States and Japan. It finds that the evaluation of humanities and social sciences in these countries is highly institutionalized and internationalized, the originality of research results, the social impact of research, Sustainable development is the main content of the evaluation criteria. The evaluation process is standardized and expert-led. The measurement indicators are for reference only. The external evaluation based on the high-level representative is a basic evaluation form. These experiences have important reference for establishing the evaluation system of humanities and social sciences in our country, guiding the humanities and social sciences research to social practice, facing the international standards and facing the sustainable development.