论文部分内容阅读
宋代公使库与地方政府的刊刻活动有密切联系,这是一个为学界所熟知的判断,由此又衍生出所谓“公使库本”的概念,即许多研究者将公使库视为刊刻的主体,将在刊印文记中注明“公使库”的刻本视为公使库刊刻的成果并予以专门归类,乃至将之与各级地方政府(路、府州军)刻本、各级官学刻本并列为宋代地方政府刻本的主要形式。然而审视宋代公使库建制以及公使钱的运行机制则会发现,上述认识存在较为明显的问题,所谓“公使库本”实为一个难以成立的概念,宋代公使钱在刻书活动中发挥的经费支持作用,也非通常意义上的“公使库本”概念所能涵盖,因此实有必要对有关问题予以澄清和纠正。
It is a well-known judgment in the academic world that the Song Dynasty courthouse is closely linked with the publication activities of the local government, which in turn leads to the concept of the so-called “minister’s library”, in which many researchers consider the minister’s library as an engraving The main body will treat the inscriptions printed in the textbook as “the database of the ministers” as the result of the inscriptions published by the magistrate and be categorized as such, or even classify them with the local governments (roads and prefectures) at all levels, The official version of the book tied for the Song Dynasty, the main form of local government edition. However, when examining the operation system of the court system and the minister’s money in the Song Dynasty, we find that there is a more obvious problem in the above understanding. The so-called “capitalist” is actually a concept that is hard to be established and the minister’s money in the song dynasty Supportive role, nor is it usually covered by the concept of “the public library”, it is indeed necessary to clarify and correct the relevant issues.