论文部分内容阅读
学业失败的证据:百分之二十五的儿童在小学第一学年不会阅读……半数重读生在小学第一学年或其它年级的重读中毫无收益……百分之五十的儿童在小学阶段的学业上遇到暂时性的或长期性的困难。据 CRESAS 研究,不会顺利阅读的儿童大量属于工人阶级子女。这些统计数字是官方的,这就很令人不安了。因为问题以这样的方式提出,它就不再是一个教育学问题,而是个社会问题。实际上,这就是说机会的不平等在六岁起点上已经表现出来,甄选已经在起作用。该不该象有些人希望的那样推迟阅读的学习?这在今天是拿不定的。相反,我们却试图
Evidence of academic failure: 25% of children will not read in the first year of primary school ... Half of repeat students have no return in the first year or any other grade of primary school ... 50% of children Primary school or school experience temporary or long-term difficulties. According to the CRESAS study, a large number of children who do not read well belong to working-class children. These statistics are official, which is very disturbing. Since the question is put forward in this way, it is no longer a pedagogical question, but a social question. In practice, this means that inequality of opportunity has already been demonstrated at the beginning of the six-year-old period and selection is already at work. Should not defer reading as some would expect? This is uncertain today. Instead, we tried